I always thought that the West Nile virus was a tropical disease
that only affected rugged explorers of the Nile River–I mean it has to be
called the West Nile virus for a reason. This virus has certainty made is presence
known in the US, since as of October 4th 2016 the CDC reported 1,162 cases of West Nile Virus infection. The
virus’s name does offer some historical insight as WNV was first identified in
the West Nile region of Uganda in a woman in 1937. The virus mysteriously made its way to the US
in 1999, and within five years it spread to Canada, the Caribbean, and Central
America. While the virus affects humans, it is also capable of infecting birds.
However, a recent journal has reported that wild snakes can harbor WNV. This study also raised important
questions in the role of snakes in the eco-epidemiology of WNV, while also
reporting that oral swabs of snakes can successfully report WNV
infection.
This study was important as it offered an explanation for why the
WNV outbreak in the northeastern US was unusually severe this year.
According to the study, infected snakes that hibernate over the winter incubate the virus, and then mosquitos bite the snakes and pass the virus to
birds and humans.
Establishing the link between snakes and WNV is good news for
control efforts, since controlling the snake virus reservoir could reduce WNV
human infection rates.
I think a round of applause is in order for the researchers who
did mouth swabs of snakes to help further our understanding of WNV.
A cottonmouth snake, which has been shown to harbor West Nile
Virus (Image credit)
-Cynthia Taylor
No comments:
Post a Comment