Leonard Adelman
writes in his op-ed “Resurrecting Smallpox” that he even though smallpox may
have been eradicated from the natural environment, he is “worried, but also amazed. Smallpox has
miraculously and unconsciously saved itself through an extraordinary act of
evolution.” This statement alludes to the preservation of humankind’s most
infamous viral scourge not only in special labs but in a potentially more insidious
platform: computers. Adelman acknowledges the ongoing discourse surrounding
keeping smallpox around in isolation for science, but he claims that digital
storage of the virus’ genome may prove to be more important for determining how
feasible the resurrection of smallpox is. In essence, recreating the genome of
the virus is made possible by storing the genome sequence digitally, but this wouldn't
have happened in 1990 if the virus had truly been eradicated from labs.
While I think that we could
have escaped this fate if we actually got
rid of the virus, the implications of keeping the genomic information lends the
virus some permanence in our world. We could consider banning the machines that
recreate and produce DNA strands at will, as the author suggests, but that
would never take. In a way, smallpox has effectively evolved again, only this
time, humans have made it immemorial. It’s terrifying to think that almost any
well-equipped lab could manufacture smallpox, but what is even more grim is the
possibility that it could be made into a more virulent weapon. However, we can
never live without our computers and compliance from world powers would mean
appealing to a common trust in their ability to destroy their stores of
smallpox. Both seem pretty unlikely, but hopefully it never gets to the point
where hypotheticals concerning smallpox are realized.
-Andrew
-Andrew
No comments:
Post a Comment